Acrobat Sign - General
Your feedback is essential to helping us shape the future of Acrobat Sign. That’s why we have partnered with UserVoice, a third-party service, to create this site to hear your ideas and suggestions. Here, you can send us ideas for new features you’d like to see or report bugs that are getting in your way.
The UserVoice feedback pages are for feature requests and bug reports only. If your submission is not a product feature, suggestion, or product question, it may be removed. Only upload content that you have permission to use and refrain from posting personal information (home address, phone number, email address, serial number, or credit card information). Spam, content that promotes illegal activity, vulgar or abusive language, or fraudulent or phishing links are not allowed on this platform.
UserVoice is a third-party platform for product feedback. The Acrobat Sign team regularly reviews ideas and incorporates them into product planning discussions. We can’t guarantee specific features or development timelines, but we read every suggestion and respond where we can. Please note that feedback is voluntary, and if you provide feedback, you give Adobe the right to use it without restrictions.
For all other questions and discussions, visit the Adobe Acrobat Sign forum.
Submit feature requests and bug reports to our product teams via this UserVoice site. You can also look at ideas and issues that other users have submitted and vote for ideas you like.
How it works:
- Select the feedback forum for your product.
- Browse ideas and vote for the ones you like.
- If your feature idea or issue is not listed, post it.
151 results found
-
New Feature: Allow users to Copy/Paste fields when Previewing & Adding fields
Currently users cannot copy and paste fields in bulk (Ctrl+C/V).
Users can copy by right-clicking individual fields, but they cannot do it in bulk. Deleting in bulk is possible by right-clicking and keyboard.
Either through right-clicking, or keyboard shortcuts, users should have a way to increase the speed and ease of adding fields in bulk.
4 votes -
Allow group admins to manage sharing for users in the group without being an account admin
Because we have multiple groups, a group admin cannot delegate sharing in a group that they are admin of without being an account admin. It would be great if they had the sharing tab avaiable to them.
4 votes -
Add Name change option in Webforms to ensure they can adapt business requirement changes
The webforms name should be set to allow for editing. This is important to allow for enterprise products ability to use this feature, so they can adapt business requirement changes
4 votes -
Required fields - asterisk size too big and covering the field
The required fields have a asterisk on them at the beggining whitch is no ideal when you have a small box that needs on 1-2 characters in it like a date. this looks very unprofessional on a mobile device or even on the PC.
The asterisk should be outside the required field in the top left corner of it. It should be Red and small, unlike where it is now. Not obstructing the field.
The text in the multiline boxes is huge for the client input. If we set it up to a specific size in the field properties it…
4 votes -
4 votes
-
Remove email addresses from the suggestion list
Need the ability to remove email addresses that have changed, are no longer needed, misspelled, etc. The old format offered this, I'm surprised the new version does not. This should be a top priority for implementation.
4 votes -
Prevent Users from Drawing Below the Signature Line
Please prevent users from being able to sign or draw below the signature line.
Currently, if someone draws below the line, it will cover up their printed name below and you aren't able to tell who signed the document.4 votes -
Template Folder
Our organization supports over 200 individual buildings, each with hundreds of recurring document templates such as procedures, compliance forms, access authorizations, and operational approvals. Today, all templates exist in a single list, which creates the following challenges:
Difficult template discovery and slower user workflows
Increased risk of selecting the wrong template for the wrong building
Limited ability to delegate ownership or manage access by location or team
Poor scalability as the number of templates continues to growIntroduce template folders and subfolders within Acrobat Sign that allow administrators to organize templates by logical groupings such as:
Building or site identifier…
4 votes -
Dynamic File Naming Using Signer or Field Values
I would like the ability to dynamically populate the signed agreement file name using either a signer name or the value from a specific form field.
For example:[Template Name] – [Signer Name].pdf
[Template Name] – [Student ID Field].pdf
[Department] – [Signer Last Name] – Signed.pdfThis would allow organizations to generate meaningful, consistent, and searchable file names automatically at the time of signing, without requiring manual renaming after download or storage.
4 votes -
Note Icon in Manage is MISSING
Please add back the icon in the Manage page so we can see the NOTES that are entered for a completed agreement!
4 votes -
Adobe Sign send in bulk: Preview before send
When using the 'send in bulk' feature (formerly Mega Sign)the preview should give you a view of at least what one of the sent requests will look like (pre-populated with details pull from spreadsheet). Ideally also some information on how many users it will send to and which fields will be populated. E.g. if there is a mapping error it would be easier to spot on the preview and fix the spreadsheet. Possible a second preview page before sending.
3 votes -
Ensure default and available authentication methods are read from the selected group when the option "Users in multiple groups" is enabled
When enabling the Users In Multiple Groups functionality and a sender selects a Send from group all the associated Group Setting should be used. Currenty the following settings are defined by the senders primary group and not the selected Send from group:
• Enable the following identity authentication methods for recipients
• By default, use the following methodThis makes it possible for a sender to select a group which is intended for signatures meeting specific regulatory requirements (with a set of allowed authentication methods) and then still be able to select a non-approved authentication method as these are read…
3 votes -
Auto-Number Feature
I would like the ability to have an auto-number field feature for documents/templates such as purchase requisitions which makes it a lot easier to keep a track of and for the purchasing department to reference them in the future.
3 votes -
Provide better user-group sync capabilities when Sign console is linked to Admin Console
At this moment, when the Sign console is linked to the Admin Console (where all user-management is centralised and managed e.g. by Active Directory sync), newly created users are not automatically inheriting the user-group settings from e.g. Admin Console.
It forces admins to still log into the Sign Console, create user-groups there, then assign users. It is a still manual process, bound to human error.
When a Sign console is linked to the Admin console it should inherit all user-groups (and their permissions/settings) from there without manual interactions.
3 votes -
Multiline Form fields in Web Forms
If a form input field in a web-form is set to multi-line, the document is sent for review with no way for the next signer to be able to view content they are signing. This seems like a legal liability, in addition to a severely broken interaction.
This is unacceptable; it is, at the least, trivial for a form-filler to hide text without the signer being aware. If there is a multi-line field, there needs be either:
1) A way to force signers to "expand" the multi-line boxes before signing
2) A way for Orgs to "approve" forms that permits…3 votes -
Enable If/Then Signer Approval Routing Depending on Other Form Field Conditions
I've been trying to figure out a way to set a web form so that a 2nd/additional level of approval by a different person is ONLY required if certain conditions are met (i.e. if a specific account type is chosen or if a requested amount exceeds a specific dollar threshold), but I cannot seem to get this to work in Adobe Sign. I've tried different role assignments, different Condition settings, but no matter what I do, the web form keeps routing the form to the 2nd level regardless of the my signer, role, or conditional field settings.
3 votes -
It would be great to have the possibility to save a custom dropdown list then you can reuse it for many documents. signature process
In a process of signature approval / you make the manager choose a cost center and then sign it
3 votes -
Allow inputting recipient group participants from workflow. This was previous functionality, but was removed.
Allow inputting recipient group participants from workflow. This was previous functionality, but was removed.
3 votes -
Add a configuration option not to flatten PDF files when uploading for e-Signatures
Adobe Acrobat Sign is stripping off Certificates applied prior to uploading for e-Signatures. Please create an option in the Account Configuration to not strip off the Signatures for Digital Signatures placed using the Adobe Acrobat desktop products. Many large companies have internal systems for routing documents for signatures (using required Certificate Authorities) up until the point of seeking client signoff.
3 votes -
Change the placement of the Terms of Use Continue button on webforms to the middle of the screen
When opening a web form to fill out, the Terms of Use disclaimer appears at the bottom of the screen and prompts the user to click Continue.
The placement of the button at the bottom of the screen confuses many users who aren't careful to read the small text. They immediately think the Continue button is for submitting the form. Then, they are confused as to why they can't fill out the form. It is poor UX design to put the button on the bottom of the screen. It should be in the middle or possibly very clear on the…3 votes
- Don't see your idea?